Resistance to water deficit of transgenic winter wheat plants of the T3 seed generation with overexpression of the ornithine-Δ-aminotransferase gene
Abstract
Aim. To investigate the resistance to water deficit of transgenic plants of new genotypes of winter soft wheat of the T3 seed generation with overexpression of the proline synthesis gene under physiological and stress conditions. Methods. Genetic transformation by the in planta method, physiological and biochemical, mathematical statistics. Results. In transgenic T3 plants, it was confirmed that the increased activity of the ornithine-δ-aminotransferase enzyme does not significantly affect the content of free proline either under control conditions or under water deficit conditions. It was confirmed that overexpression of the oat gene promotes more active root development in genetically modified plants both under normal and drought conditions: in terms of root length, they exceeded the plants of the original genotypes by 3.9–4.5 cm under normal irrigation, and by 3.3–3.8 cm under drought conditions. Under soil drought conditions, biotechnological plants outperformed the original ones by 14–19 % in terms of grain quantity per plant, and by 10–16 % in terms of grain mass per plant. Conclusions. It was shown that transgenic T3 plants with overexpression of the oat gene are characterized by relatively higher resistance to soil drought conditions than control plants. Activation of growth processes, which is manifested in an increase in stem height and better development of the root system, improves adaptive plasticity and yield of genetically modified plants.
References
Erenstein O., Jaleta M., Mottaleb K. et al. Global trends in wheat production, consumption and trade. Wheat improvement. 2022. Vol. 5. P. 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90673-3_4.
Nowsherwan I., Shabbir G., Malik S. I. et al. Effect of drought stress on different physiological traits in bread wheat. SAARS J. Agric. 2018. Vol. 16. P. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3329/SJA.V16I1.37418.
Hossain A., Skalicky M., Brestic M. et al. Consequences and mitigation strategies of abiotic stresses in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under the changing climate. Agronomy. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 241–250. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020241.
Kapoor D., Bhardwaj S., Landi M. Sharma A., Ramakrishnan M., Sharma A. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl. Sci. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 5692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165692.
El-Mouhamady A., El-Hawary M., Habouh M. Transgenic wheat for drought stress tolerance, Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 2023. Vol. 12. P. 77–94. https://doi: 10.36632/mejar/2023.12.2.17.
Dubrovna O. V., Mуkhalska S. I., Komisarenko A. G. Using of proline metabolism genes in plant genetic engineering. Cytology and genetics. 2022. Vol. 56. P. 361–378. https://doi.org/10.3103/S009545272204003X.
Ghosh U. K., Islam M. N., Siddiqui M. N., Cao X., Khan M. A. R. Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: understanding the physiological mechanisms. Plant Biology. 2022. Vol. 24. P. 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13363.
Anwar A., She M., Wang K., Ye X. Biological roles of ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) in plant stress tolerance: present progress and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 3681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113681.
Anwar A., Wang K., Wang J. Expression of Arabidopsis Ornithine Aminotransferase (AtOAT) Encoded Gene Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in Wheat. Plant Cell Rep. 2021. Vol. 40. P. 1155–1170. https://doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02699-0.
Funck D., Stadelhofer B., Koch W. Ornithine-delta-aminotransferase is essential for arginine catabolism but not for proline bio-synthesis. BMC Plant Biology. 2008. Vol. 8. P. 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-40.
Dubrovna O. V., Priadkina G. O., Mykhalska S. I., Komisarenko A. G. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of transgenic winter wheat plants with overexpression of ornithine-δ-aminotransferase gene. Fiziol. rast. genet. 2023. Vol. 55. P. 58–73. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2023.01.058.
Bates L. S., Waldren R. P., Teare I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973. Vol. 39. Р. 205–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060.
Madan S., Nainawatee H. S., Jain R. K., Сhowdhury J. B. Proline and proline metabolizing enzymes in vitro selected NaCl-tolerant. Ann Bot. 1995. Vol. 76. Р. 51–57. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42764614.
Dubrovna O. V., Priadkina G. O., Mykhalska S. I., Komisarenko A. G. Water deficiency tolerance of genetically modified common wheat cv. Zymoyarka, containing a heterologous ornithine-δ-aminotransferase gene. Agricultural Science and Practice. Vol. 8. P. 25–39. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp8.01.014.
Sharma S., Verslues P. E. Mechanisms independent of abscisic acid (ABA) or proline feedback have a pre-dominant role in transcriptional regulation of proline metabolism during low water potential and stress recovery. Plant Cell Environ. 2010. Vol. 33. Р. 1838–1851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02188.x.